Erich von Falkenhayn later claimed that his tactics at Verdun were designed not to take the city but rather to destroy the French Army in its defense. One of the most enduring examples of attrition warfare on the Western Front is the Battle of Verdun, which took place throughout most of 1916.

For years, without any opportunity for maneuvers, the only way the commanders thought that they could defeat the enemy was to repeatedly attack head on and grind the other down. Both military forces found themselves in static defensive positions in trenches running from Switzerland to the English Channel. The best-known example of attrition warfare might be on the Western Front during World War I. The Battle of Verdun resulted in over 700,000 casualties Attrition warfare also tries to increase the friction in a war for the opponent. That should be seen as opposed to other main goals such as the conquest of some resource or territory or an attempt to cause the enemy great losses in a single stroke (such as by encirclement and capture). One can be said to pursue a strategy of attrition if one makes it the main goal to cause gradual attrition to the opponent eventually amounting to unacceptable or unsustainable levels for the opponent while limiting one's own gradual losses to acceptable and sustainable levels. The difference between war of attrition and other forms of war is somewhat artificial since even a single battle normally contains an element of attrition. But in World War I military commanders on both sides relied on attrition warfare resulting in terrible casualties without a strategic result. When attritional methods have worn down the enemy sufficiently to make other methods feasible, attritional methods are often complemented or even abandoned by other strategies. Sun Tzu has stated, that there is no country that has benefitted from prolonged warfare, but Russia in 1812 won the war with attrition warfare against Napoleon. Ī side that perceives itself to be at a marked disadvantage may deliberately seek out attrition warfare to neutralize its opponent's advantages over time.

Clausewitz called it the exhaustion of the adversary. The side that reinforces their army at a higher speed will normally win the war. Attrition warfare does not include all kinds of Blitzkrieg or using concentration of force and a decisive battle to win. Attrition warfare represents an attempt to grind down an opponent's ability to make war by destroying their military resources by any means including guerrilla warfare, people's war, scorched earth and all kind of battles apart from a decisive battle.

Iron marines war of attrition